Duplicate coverage in adjacent districts wastes 8-12% of protection budgets

Two agencies delivering explosive-ordnance risk education in the same wards led to repeated sessions for the same households.

Published 7/30/2026

Coverage overlap surfaced only at the sixth month of implementation, after beneficiary lists were reconciled. Publishing planned ward-level coverage at design stage, and checking it against other registered interventions in the same sector and geography, would have avoided the overlap. Deduplication should be a standing agenda item in sector coordination.

Related knowledge

Community-led water point maintenance committees cut downtime by half

Handing over routine maintenance of boreholes to trained village committees reduced average repair time from 19 days to 8 days across WASH interventions.

Final evaluation: emergency education response for conflict-affected children

Independent evaluation found strong enrolment recovery (87% of target) but weak retention of adolescent girls without a transport or stipend component.

Cash transfer value must be re-indexed mid-project in high-inflation contexts

Fixed transfer values set at design lost 34% of purchasing power within nine months, eroding the intended food-security outcome.

Anticipatory action triggers deliver assistance 11 days earlier on average

Pre-agreed forecast triggers with pre-positioned stock shortened the gap between hazard onset and first distribution from 14 days to 3 days.